About the Declaration

The Nordic (Covid-19) Declaration came about through a Nordic Dialogue of Medical Professionals including some 50 medical doctors from clinical medicine (GPs and Medical Specialists) and Academic Medicine (Epidemiologists, Immunologists and Microbiologists). We are joined by other health professionals (nurses and other health practicioners) and by pharmacists and lawyers.

The Nordic Covid Declaration – published on the 09th of December 2021 – is a joint declaration signed by health professionals, lawyers, academics and concerned citizens from Nordic Countries  that supports and builds on the Great Barrington Declaration and the Rome Declaration and many  numerous initiatives such as: Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care AllianceDoctors for Covid EthicsWorld Doctors AllianceHart Group,  American Frontline Doctors , Covid 19 Assembly Brownstone Institute, the German Corona Investigative Committee, Daily ExposeCollateral Global and others – that  all are openly critical to  the policies that governments have been implementing since the declaration by the World Health Organization (WHO) of a Pandemic on March 11 , 2020.

From these and many other groups come some of the foremost legal and academic and medical – clinical experts from around the world  that have been dealing with the clinical management, basic and public health science and legalities surrounding Covid-19 and SARS-Cov2.  

On the 17th of March 2020 John P.A. Ioannidis – Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology and Population Health at Stanford Universi`ty’s «School of Medicine» – writes:

“A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data”

“Draconian countermeasures have been adopted in many countries. If the pandemic dissipates — either on its own or because of these measures — short-term extreme social distancing and lockdowns may be bearable. How long, though, should measures like these be continued if the pandemic churns across the globe unabated ? How can policymakers tell if they are doing more good than harm? Conversely, with lockdowns of months, if not years, life largely stops, short-term and long-term consequences are entirely unknown, and billions, not just millions, of lives may be eventually at stake. If we decide to jump off the cliff, we need some data to inform us about the rationale of such an action and the chances of landing somewhere safe»

In October of 2020 three leading epidemiologist – Dr. Jay Bhattacharya (Stanford), Dr. Sunetra Gupta (Oxford) and Dr. Martin Kulldorff (Harvard) –  formulated a declaration at Great Barrington, Massachusetts that became known as the  Great Barrington Declaration. The Declaration was written from a global public health and humanitarian perspective, with special concerns about the then current COVID-19 strategies.  The response to the pandemic in many countries around the world, focused on lockdowns, contact tracing and isolation and was imposing enormous unnecessary health costs.  Infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists had already then expressed grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommended a Focused Protection Approach.  It was concluded that the current government policies would lead to higher COVID and non-COVID mortality. Numerous Studies undertaken since then have strengthened this conclusion  (read more here).

Test and Trace using PCR and Lateral Flow Test (Rapid test)

Numerous studies and reviews have shown clearly that the current regime adopted in many countries worldwide with so-called test and trace in healthy populations are not suited as markers for infectious epidemics in healthy populations and can no longer be justified as a guide for public health interventions (read more here).

Lockdown, School Closures, Isolation, Quarantine, Mask Mandates and other Measures

Numerous studies have now shown that there is no compelling evidence for pursuing coercive government policies of isolation and quarantine that limit the freedom of the population and coercive mandates for the wearing of cloth or medical masks (read more here).

All these measures including lockdowns and school closures have shown alone, or in combination, to only have extreme detrimental effects to individuals and the society at large (read more here).

Prevention measures such as the use of Vitamin-D and Zinc supplements are known to give protection against respiratory tract infections and vitamin-D is now clearly showing to have an important potential in the prevention of Covid-19.

Mass Vaccination and Adverse Events

With the introduction of mass vaccination programs a new and unknown and now deeply disturbing scenario has emerged where data from several countries are showing a surge in hospital admissions of persons diagnosed with Covid-19 and deaths of primarily vaccinated persons (read more here).  The overall increase in excess mortality in 25 European countries (www.euromomo.eu) by a factor of 9 from 2019 to the end of 2021 is deeply disturbing. From 2020 to end of 2021, after one year into the mass vaccination campaign excess mortality in the youngest vaccinated group of 15 to 44 increased by a factor of 2.3 (230%). As with increase in the older age groups the increase shows a clear temporal association to the time when vaccination was initiaited in each age group.    

The vaccines that are currently being administered in most western countries including Nordics Countries, the UK, EU, North- and South America and the Asia-Pacific  regions – are based on experimental gene-based technology (Nanoparticle-mRNA and Virus Vector-DNA) that code for a spike protein that supposedly are derived from a master copy of the SARS Covid2.   These have been introduced based on incomplete clinical research experimentation and have been given approval only for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)  (read more here). These experiments could not document clinical meaningful effects or protective effects against SARS-Cov2 in their clinical phase III studies . After the few weeks of follow-up to end point analysis – the studies were opened and participants in the control groups were offered real vaccine components and thereby, in all practical purposes, closing these studies for any meaningful long term follow-up (read more here).      

Vaccine adverse reporting systems from North America (US-VAERS, Canada – CAEFISS) the European Union  (Eudra Vigilance) and from the UK and Nordic Countries  – have from the very introduction of the Covid-19 vaccination program revealed a disturbingly high number of reported adverse events and deaths compared to previous mass vaccination programs (read more here). 

When a group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency asked Pfizer to share the raw data from their COVID vaccine trials and post-marketing surveillance that was used to license the injection, the pharma giant linked up with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to refuse the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

In fact, the FDA (meant to serve and protect public health) hired Justice Department lawyers and went to court to shield the pharmaceutical giant from having to reveal its data – for 55 years. The FDA and Pfizer did not want anyone to see the numbers behind their COVID vaccine until 2076.

A judge ruled that the FDA and Pfizer would have to answer their FOIA requests. Among the first reports handed over by Pfizer was a “Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports” describing events reported to Pfizer up until February 2021.

Active substances of the gene based vaccines – nanoparticles (Pfizer-Biontech) and Adenovirus Vectors (Janssen – Johnson & Johnson, Astra Zeneca) –  have now been documented to escape from the deltoid muscle of the upper arm (site of injection) into the circulation system to all organs of the body including the brain (crossing the blood brain barrier) where the nanoparticles and adenovirus (vectors) enter into the endothelial cells and where mRNA and DNA is released and code for spike proteins.

The spike proteins then escape into the blood where they act as a toxin in the same way as the spike proteins of SARS-CoV2. It is also hypothesised that they cover the surfaces of the normally smooth endothelial cells that now attract blood platelets leading to pathological clotting processes (thrombosis) followed by death of platelets (thrombocytopenia) leading to haemorrhages. These clotting processes have shown to appear in all organs and have immediate and deadly consequences when they occur in the coronary arteries of the heart and sinus veins of the brain (see below).

After a careful review by the National Treatment Service for Advanced Platelet Immunology (Laboratory for Platelet Immunology) at the University Hospital of Northern Norway, an unequivocal conclusion has been reached that these coagulation disorders – which now maim and kill young healthy people – are antibody mediated and linked to the vaccines currently being administered (read more here).

It has been shown that up to 62% of those who have been vaccinated may have so-called postvaccination micro-thrombosis. These can have devastating effects in heart muscle and lung tissue and many other organs including the brain as these particles have shown to cross the so called brain-blood barrier. Nanoparticles have also shown to concentrate in ovaries and testicles with potential for causing infertility in both males and females (read more here).

 In Norway in April of 2021 immune-mediated coagulation disorders resulted in the death of 7 healthcare workers – similar to those described in severely ill Covid-19 patients.  This included both cerebral haemorrhage following immune-mediated thrombocytopenia and thrombosis manifested as a rare form of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) and, as far as we know, have never been described as adverse effects of vaccination.

Within ten days of receiving a first vaccination (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) five healthcare professionals aged 32 to 54 years were diagnosed with thrombosis in unusual sites with severe thrombocytopenia. Of five patients admitted to Oslo University Hospital, four patients had severe cerebral haemorrhage (read more here).

The Norwegian Medicines Agency stated that “the five cases show a new and rare disease manifestation”. They have a very unusual combination of low platelet counts and simultaneous thrombosis in small and large vessels as well as bleeding ” (read more here).

After a careful examination and analysis of the serum of these patients at the National Treatment Service for Advanced Platelet Immunology (Laboratory for Platelet Immunology) of the University Hospital of Northern Norway -came to an unequivocal conclusion that these coagulation disorders are antibody mediated and directly linked to the vaccines administered (virus vector AstraZeneca-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) (read more here).

Similar report where coming from the other Nordic Countries, EU countries and UK and North America. These newly described  serious and life threatening adverse events had been described by the manufacturers but were not reported in any of the clinical trials (read more here).

A number of important and fundamental questions came to the European Medicine Agency (EMA) from leading researchers and doctors about these incidents (read more here).

It is important to emphasize that these side effects are now clearly shown not to be vaccine specific but are being reported for all the gene based “vaccines” (read more here).

Letter to Physicians: Four New Scientific Discoveries Regarding COVID-19 Immunity and Vaccines – Implications for Safety and Efficacy

A Surge in hospitalization of Vaccinated in many Countries

A surge in hospitalizations of fully vaccinated has been observed in many countries especially in those countries that attained a high degree of the full two-dose vaccine coverage like Israel, Island and United Kingdom. These so called “breakthrough” cases have been reported to be caused by the so-called Delta Variant – a variant that has shown to be more transmissible than the original master-copy described from Wuhan, China. There has been na growing concern that these “breakthrough” cases that lead to hospitalization and death may be due to so-called Pathogenic Priming (PP) or Antibody Dependant Enhancement (ADE) that have been described from animal studies of corona vaccines for almost two decades (read more here ). We also suspect that many of these cases that are reported as Covid-19 are in fact are primarily due to sever adverse vaccine events. Data for possible hospitalisation of persons with vaccine injuries, unlike hospitalisations of Covid-19 patients have not been made public.

Vaccination of Children and Young People

With this background it is difficult to understand that – instead of a reassessment of the entire vaccination program – we are now seeing that most western governments are now making great efforts to vaccinate  Young People from 12 to 18 years of age and now plans are in place to “vaccinate” children under 12 years of age.   

It is now well documented that the Children and Young people (CYP)  have no absolute or relative increased risk to be hospitalized or die from Covid-19 and are not spreaders of disease –  but are now being put under a vaccination regime that will  increase both the relative and absolute risk of severe adverse reactions and death compared to non vaccinated (read more here).

Legalities surrounding Covid-19

There are now serious legal issues surrounding Covid-19 that address Natural and Constitutional Law, Human Rights Declarations and Conventions and the Nurenberg Code.

The main premiss for the enactment of the draconian measures in all countries is an argument that there exists a state of emergency related to a local and global threat to public health.

The enactment of these measures according to constitutional law must be supported by evidence that they in some way reduce a perceived public health threat. None of the interventions that have been enacted have a root in public health or clinical practice and are contrary to what has been agreed as part of international health regulations (WHO) that relates to pandemics preparedness and global health emergencies. The declaration of Covid-19 as a Global Health Emergency and subsequently a Pandemic are not aligned with the WHO own definitions or with what can be constituted as a reasonable threat to public health.

SARS-Cov2 is a novel virus with dubious origins that is of particular concern and needs countries to be vigilant in the monitoring of of excess mortality as is being practiced with the seasonal respiratory outbreaks.

But it is now clear after some 24 months of observation through the monitoring of excess mortality in the U.S (CDC) and Canada (C-CDC) , China (C-CDC), New Zealand and Australia and the 28 countries of Europe (EUROMOMO) – that the SARS-Cov2 has never attained a level of threat that is extraordinary compared to a seasonal influenza in a global public health perspective and in most countries is comparable to a mild to moderate seasonal Influenza.

With this background there has been no legal basis for the enactment of the draconian measures that clearly constitute a serious breach of both “natural” and “positive law” (enacted laws of a state or society) and numerous International conventions and of the Nurenberg Code as related to coercive practices related to bodily integrity and medical experimentation (read more here).